12/05/2017

    北朝鮮の新型 ICBM は米大陸東岸まで届く ‼

 

Pedestrians at a railway station in Seoul on Wednesday watch a television news program showing pictures of U.S. President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. | AFP-JIJI

Was North Korea’s latest missile launch an olive branch in disguise?

by and Jesse JohnsonStaff Writers

Soon after the launch of what the regime described as a Hwasong-15 intercontinental ballistic missile, the North Korean government issued a statement boasting that the regime had “finally realized the great historic cause of completing the state nuclear force.”

Pyongyang then said its pursuit of the “strategic weapon” had been intended to “defend the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the country from the U.S. imperialists’ nuclear blackmail policy,” and emphasized that it would “not pose any threat to any country and region as long as the interests of the DPRK (the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea) are not infringed upon.”

“The DPRK will make every possible effort to serve the noble purpose of defending peace and stability of the world,” it added.

Atsuhito Isozaki, an associate professor at Keio University who specializes in North Korean politics, said the latest statement signaled a departure from similar declarations by Pyongyang in the past, where the emphasis, according to the professor, was by and large placed on its determination to continue its nuclear and missile development program in the future.

“Granted that they’ve always claimed their missile program was for world peace, but what stands out this time around is their claim that they have now officially accomplished their goal — not to mention the fact there was no reference to their future pursuit” of weapons development, Isozaki said.

“This potentially means they have reached a certain level of closure military-wise,” he added.

The closure, he said, may prompt Pyongyang to shift more toward boosting the country’s economy under its self-declared “byungjin” policy — the “parallel development of the economy and defense capabilities” — signaling the possibility the regime may now start taking the importance of diplomacy and dialogue more seriously.

Narushige Michishita, professor of international relations at the National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies in Tokyo, also said the latest statement could be interpreted as a sign that the regime seeks dialogue. But at the same time, he said, there may be another motive at play.

“It’s possible that Pyongyang is floating its willingness to talk to manipulate the public sentiment here against pressure and therefore sow divisions,” Michishita said. “In that sense, I think the statement is very carefully phrased.”

Responding to Wednesday’s launch, the U.S., for its part, clarified its position that it is open to talks with North Korea.

“Diplomatic options remain viable and open, for now,” Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said in a statement. “The United States remains committed to finding a peaceful path to denuclearization and to ending belligerent actions by North Korea.”

But some experts have taken a more pessimistic approach about the prospects of dialogue.

Tillerson’s assertion that Washington embraces a “peaceful” resolution of the current nuclear crisis on the Korean Peninsula does not offer much comfort, according to Van Jackson, a senior lecturer of political science and international relations at University of Wellington, New Zealand.

“I think Tillerson is irrelevant. He doesn’t know what he means when he uses the word ‘diplomacy,’ and he’s consistently off-message with others in the administration — most notably Trump and (National Security Adviser H.R.) McMaster,” said Jackson, a North Korea expert and former policy adviser in the U.S. Office of the Secretary of Defense.

McMaster, he said, shares the same sentiment as Sen. Lindsey Graham, who said in an interview with CNN after the launch that “at the end of the day, the president has to pick between homeland security and regional stability” and Trump is “picking America over the region” — indicating the U.S. leader may be inclined to go ahead with a pre-emptive strike on the North to protect America from any potential strike by a nuclear-tipped ICBM.

Trump and his allies “all believe North Korea hasn’t yet crossed the Rubicon and can still be attacked without starting nuclear Armageddon,” Jackson said. “They’re wrong, and even if there’s a chance they’re right, it’s not worth the gamble.”

 

A Tokyo pedestrian passes a Wednesday morning news broadcast of North Korea's first missile launch since Sept. 15. | AFP-JIJI

North Korea says nuclear push completed as missile test puts entire U.S. within striking distance

by and

The fresh challenge to the U.S. and Japan saw the North launch what was apparently its longest-range missile to date after a hiatus of 10 weeks, injecting new uncertainty into the nuclear crisis on the Korean Peninsula.

In a special televised announcement, North Korea said it had “successfully carried out” a launch of the newly developed Hwasong-15 ICBM, which it said is “capable of striking the whole mainland of the U.S.”

It said the missile had soared to an altitude of 4,475 km, flying a distance of 950 km.

In a government statement run by state media, the North said that leader Kim Jong Un had observed the launch, calling it the culmination of the country’s nuclear weapons program.

“After watching the successful launch of the new type ICBM Hwasong-15, Kim Jong Un declared with pride that now we have finally realized the great historic cause of completing the state nuclear force, the cause of building a rocket power,” the official Korean Central News Agency said.

The North also lashed out at what it said was Washington’s “nuclear blackmail policy” and pointedly claimed that its own nuclear weapons program is not a threat to its neighbors.

“The development and advancement of the strategic weapon of the DPRK are to defend the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the country from the U.S. imperialists’ nuclear blackmail policy and nuclear threat, and to ensure the peaceful life of the people, and therefore, they would not pose any threat to any country and region as long as the interests of the DPRK are not infringed upon,” it said, using the formal name for the North.

Reacting to the launch, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe blasted it as “absolutely intolerable” and called for an emergency United Nations Security Council meeting.

“We will never yield to any provocative act. We will maximize our pressure” on Pyongyang, Abe said.

Pentagon spokesman Col. Robert Manning said the missile had been launched from the city of Sain-ni, just north of Pyongyang, and had traveled about 1,000 km (620 miles) before landing in the Sea of Japan.

“Initial assessment indicates that this missile was an intercontinental ballistic missile,” Manning said.

U.S. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis offered a starker assessment of the launch.

“It went higher, frankly, than any previous shot they’ve taken, a research and development effort on their part to continue building ballistic missiles that can threaten everywhere in the world, basically,” Mattis was quoted as saying.

In Tokyo, Defense Minister Itsunori Onodera told the Diet that the missile had hit a record-high altitude of “well over” 4,000 km (2,400 miles) — an altitude that he had earlier said ICBMs can reach. The ministry believes the missile has “tremendous” power, he added.

Onodera earlier said the missile was launched on a “lofted” trajectory — steep and high but not far. “We can assume it was ICBM-class,” he said.

He later said the Defense Ministry was looking into the possibility that it could have been of a “multi-stage type” missile.

The Defense Ministry reported that the missile had been launched around 3:18 a.m. and flew for about 50 minutes before landing inside Japan’s exclusive economic zone.

Abe, speaking to the Upper House of the Diet later in the day, asserted that Tokyo had a “complete grasp” of the missile’s movement throughout its travel.

Following an emergency teleconference with U.S. President Donald Trump soon after the launch, Abe said that Tokyo and Washington had agreed China has a bigger role to play in reining in Pyongyang and that the allies will further boost cooperation with South Korea in forming a united front against the regime.

China, the North’s sole major ally, expressed “grave concern” at the test, while urging all sides to act cautiously.

The launch was North Korea’s first since it lobbed an intermediate-range missile over Hokkaido on Sept. 15, and could diminish any room the hiatus had created for a diplomatic approach to reining in the country’s nuclear program. Top U.S. officials have at times appeared to back the idea of direct talks with Pyongyang if it halts its tests of missiles and nuclear bombs.

U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said, “The United States strongly condemns North Korea’s launch of what is likely an intercontinental ballistic missile into the Sea of Japan, indiscriminately threatening its neighbors, the region and global stability.”

Tillerson said the U.S. and its allies “must continue to send a unified message” to the North that it “must abandon its WMD programs,” but he also noted that a doorway to talks remains open despite the test.

“Diplomatic options remain viable and open, for now,” Tillerson said. “The United States remains committed to finding a peaceful path to denuclearization and to ending belligerent actions by North Korea.”

But Abe, speaking before the Diet, doubled down on his policy of heaping pressure on Pyongyang and claimed that the world should not succumb to fears that Pyongyang may resort to military action in response.

“North Korea has always kept the upper hand in diplomacy by tapping into the global community’s fear it could run reckless if pressured too hard — which is actually its biggest diplomatic leverage,” Abe said.

This is how, he said, the regime won promises of massive financial assistance from countries, including Japan, under the Agreed Framework with Washington in 1994, for example, in exchange for a pledge to eliminate its nuclear weapons program. But the regime reneged on its vow and further ramped up its uranium enrichment program, Abe said.

“If we back down to avoid them running reckless, that would be exactly what they want,” Abe said. “North Korea is actually very strategic.”

Abe also sought to emphasize that his approach to diplomacy has been paying off.

Noting he had recently held bilateral talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin, Abe said their agreement to the latest round of U.N. Security Council resolutions against Pyongyang points to their commitment to the “maximum pressure” tactics pursued by Japan and the U.S.

“China, for instance, shares the position with us that Pyongyang’s nuclear weapons development is intolerable, although it’s true that their approach to the matter is different from ours,” Abe said, referring to Beijing’s preference for dialogue over pressure. “But China and Russia did agree to strict sanctions led by the U.N. in September, thanks to our diplomatic effort.”

Foreign Minister Taro Kono said Wednesday’s test-firing made it clear that Pyongyang had spent the past two months “steadily preparing for a next missile launch,” laying bare the “lack of its intention to stop” its military provocations.

The North, however, appeared to say that the tests could slow as it masters the technology needed to fit a warhead on a missile capable of striking the U.S.

It said Wednesday’s missile, which it claimed was tipped with a “super-large heavy warhead,” was far more advanced “in its tactical and technological specifications and technical characteristics” than two Hwasong-14 ICBMs it tested earlier this year.

“It is the most powerful ICBM,” the North said, and “meets the goal of the completion of the rocket weaponry system development set by the DPRK.”

David Wright, a physicist with the Union for Concerned Scientists in the United States, said that based on the initial numbers, the Hwasong-15 was likely to be Pyongyang’s longest-range test to date.

“If these numbers are correct, then if flown on a standard trajectory rather than this lofted trajectory, this missile would have a range of more than 13,000 km (8,100 miles),” Wright said. “This is significantly longer than North Korea’s previous long-range tests, which flew on lofted trajectories for 37 minutes (July 4) and 47 minutes (July 28).”

Wright said such a missile “would have more than enough range to reach Washington, D.C., and in fact any part of the continental United States.”

He cautioned, however, that the payload involved in the test was unknown, though he said it was likely a “very light mock warhead.”

“If true, that means it would be incapable of carrying a nuclear warhead to this long distance, since such a warhead would be much heavier,” he said.

The test is likely to be seen by Washington as especially provocative.

Trump has vowed to halt the North’s seemingly inexorable march toward a credible ICBM capability, vowing to use military force if necessary.

In curt remarks after the test, Trump said the United States will “take care of it.” He told reporters, “It is a situation that we will handle.” He did not elaborate, but the White House press secretary said on Twitter that Trump had been “briefed, while (the) missile was still in the air, on the situation in North Korea.”

In Seoul, media reports quoted South Korean President Moon Jae-in as saying that the launch had been anticipated and the government had been preparing for it. There was no choice but for countries to keep applying pressure and sanctions against North Korea, he said.

“The situation could get out of control if North Korea perfects its ICBM technology,” Moon said, according to the Blue House after a national security council meeting.

“North Korea shouldn’t miscalculate the situation and threaten South Korea with a nuclear weapon, which could elicit a possible pre-emptive strike by the United States,” Moon added.

South Korea, a key U.S. ally separated from the North by a highly militarized border, responded within minutes to the launch with shorter-range missile tests of its own, reports said. The “precision-strike” drill fired three missiles, including one with a 1,000-km range, and accurately hit a mock target designed to mimic the North Korean launch site.

Last week, the Trump administration relisted North Korea as a state sponsor of terrorism, further straining ties between the two countries, which are still technically at war. Washington also slapped new sanctions on North Korean shipping firms and Chinese trading companies dealing with the Pyongyang.

North Korea blasted the terrorist designation as a “serious provocation,” claiming that the move justifies its nuclear weapons program.

/

War with North Korea is not a viable option

by

Yet the possibility of nuclear war again is dominating international headlines. People have begun to share their parents’ fear of nuclear warheads raining down upon American cities.

Unfortunately. U.S. President Donald Trump’s decision to match North Korean leader Kim Jong Un threat for threat creates a serious risk of misjudgment and mistake. Peace is not advanced by the two nations’ leaders behaving like participants in a cockfight.

Most analysts who know the Korean Peninsula realize that war is not an option, other than as unavoidable self-defense. There are a few war advocates — Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham comes to mind — who suggest that a second Korean war wouldn’t be such a big deal because it would not be “over here.” Of course, the U.S. military would be involved in any fight and the North probably has the capability to hit American bases in the region.

Moreover, Pyongyang could loose murder and mayhem on South Korea and Japan. Casualties surely would be at least in the tens of thousands and perhaps many, many more. And if the conflict’s impact flowed over the North’s borders into China and Russia, Washington would face additional significant geopolitical dangers.

Yet some analysts as well as politicians, like Graham, appear to believe that the only choice is war or living with a dire North Korean nuclear threat against the American homeland. In which case they would prefer war.

Those might appear to be the only choices because the U.S. insists on remaining militarily entangled in Northeast Asia. However, it is Washington’s commitment to South Korea that has brought America into potential conflict with North Korea. So long as the U.S. intervenes militarily to protect the South from the North, the latter will prepare to offset Washington’s overwhelming military might with nukes and missiles.

However, nothing requires American troops to remain forever in South Korea. The South was a wreck in July 1953 when the armistice was signed. Today it vastly outranges the North, enjoying a 45-to-1 economic edge and 2-to-1 population advantage. Long ago South Korea gained the ability to field a military capable of deterring the North and defeating the latter’s forces if deterrence fails.

Moreover, without the Cold War context, South Korea no longer matters significantly to U.S. security. A renewed Korean conflict would be a humanitarian tragedy and highly disruptive to Asia, but neither of those problems warrant either triggering a conflagration on the peninsula or making America’s homeland a nuclear target.

Of course, the problem of South Korea defending itself against a North armed with nuclear weapons would remain. Yet it still isn’t in America’s interest to risk Los Angeles, Honolulu, Seattle, Phoenix and perhaps a host of other cities to defend Seoul — or, frankly, Tokyo, Taipei and Canberra.

Which suggests that Pyongyang’s acquisition of a nuclear arsenal is an appropriate time to consider encouraging nations threatened by the North, most obviously South Korea and Japan, to develop countervailing deterrents. Seoul started down the nuclear path a half century ago before being forced to halt by U.S. pressure. Today the South Korean public wants to finish that journey.

That would force Japanese policymakers and people to consider doing the same to confront growing challenges from the North and China. Beijing then might feel forced to do more to constrain the North’s nuclear ambitions to forestall America’s friends going nuclear.

In any case, the U.S. would escape the conundrum of choosing between war and nuclear threat. There is no reason to believe Kim is suicidal. The North seeks to avoid American involvement, not trigger it. Stepping back militarily and allowing prosperous and populous states to take over their own defense surely is better than starting the very war Washington has spent 64 years attempting to prevent.

North Korea is the land of second-best solutions, it has been said. But war is far worse than second best.

 

A Hwasong-15 missile is prepared for launch north of Pyongyang on Wednesday morning. | AFP-JIJI

Photos of new North Korean ICBM give clues on its capabilities — and limitations

                                                                                                                    AP N         

The photo dump, published in the paper and online editions of the ruling party’s official daily, is a gold mine for rocket experts trying to parse reality from bluster.

Their general conclusion is that it is bigger, more advanced and comes with a domestically made mobile launcher that will make it harder than ever to pre-emptively destroy.

But there is a potentially major catch: It might not have the power to go much farther than the West Coast if it is loaded down with a real nuclear warhead, not a dummy like the one it carried in its test launch on Wednesday.

Here is a closer look:

The missile

 

The North’s new missile appears to be significantly bigger than the Hwasong-14 ICBM it tested twice in July. It dwarfs North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, who stands about 170 cm (5 feet 7 inches) tall.

In a tweet just after the photos were published, Michael Duitsman, a researcher at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies in Monterey, California, said: “This is very big missile . . . And I don’t mean ‘Big for North Korea.’ Only a few countries can produce missiles of this size, and North Korea just joined the club.”

Size is important because a missile targeting the United States would have to carry a lot of fuel. Duitsman also suggested the new ICBM appears to have a different engine arrangement and improved steering.

The launcher

 

North Korea boasted repeatedly in its announcement of the launch Wednesday that the Hwasong-15 was fired from a domestically made erector-launcher vehicle.

Its photos back that up. Being able to make its own mobile launch vehicles, called TELs, frees the North from the need to get them from other countries, like China, which is crucial considering the tightening of international sanctions that Pyongyang faces.

TELs make it easier to move missiles around and launch them from remote locations. That makes finding and destroying the Hwasong-15 before a launch more difficult.

The payload

 

North Korea claims that the Hwasong-15 can carry a “superheavy” nuclear payload to any target in the mainland United States.

The re-entry vehicle — the nose cone in the photos the North released — does indeed look quite large. But the heavier the load the shorter the range.

Michael Elleman, a leading missile expert, has suggested in the respected 38 North blog that Hwasong-15’s estimated 13,000-km (8,100-mile) range assumes a payload of around 150 kg, which is probably much lighter than any real nuclear payload the North can produce.

To get to the West Coast, the North needs to keep that weight down to

500 kg (1,100 pounds). Whether it can do that remains questionable.

“Kim Jong Un’s nuclear bomb must weigh less than 350 kg if he expects to strike the western edges of the U.S. mainland,” Elleman esitmated. “A 600-kg payload barely reaches Seattle.”

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un watches Wednesday's missile launch on a screen. | AFP-JIJI

North Korea has yet to master critical missile re-entry technology, Seoul says

                                                                                                                                 Reuters     

South Korea said it expected Pyongyang to pause its provocative missile testing program following Wednesday’s successful flight of its new Hwasong-15 missile, which can reach the U.S. mainland.

Pyongyang has said the test was a “breakthrough.” Leader Kim Jong Un said the country had “finally realized the great historic cause of completing the state nuclear force.”

South Korea Defense Minister Song Young-moo said: “Kim Jong Un is acting in a very calculative, clever manner. Kim changed the launch time, direction and distance in order to display he has this great power.”

Song added, “He will probably make a great announcement in his New Year’s address that the North has completed its weapons program.”

South Korea’s Ministry of Defense said the Hwasong-15 missile is a new type of intercontinental ballistic missile that can fly over 13,000 km (8,000 miles), placing Washington within target range.

However, North Korea still needs to prove some technologies — such as re-entry, terminal stage guidance and warhead activation — said Yeo Suk-joo, deputy minister of defense policy at the defense ministry.

South Korean President Moon Jae-in on Thursday told U.S. President Donald Trump by phone that despite the technical issues, the new missile is North Korea’s most advanced.

According to an analysis by South Korea’s military, Yeo told lawmakers at a parliamentary session that the first-stage engine of the Hwasong-15 missile is a clustering of two engines from Hwasong-14 missiles, which are also ICBMs that were test-launched in July this year.

Yeo said the Hwasong-15 is 2 meters longer than the Hwasong-14; the second-stage engine requires further analysis.

In order to curb further provocations from the North, U.S. strategic assets will continue to be rotated on and near the Korean Peninsula until the Pyeongchang Winter Olympics next February, Yeo said.

South Korea’s Unification Ministry said it believes North Korea is unlikely to engage in more missile and rocket tests soon due to a number of reasons, including the onset of winter.

“For now if there are no sudden changes in situation or external factors, we feel there is a high chance North Korea will refrain from engaging in provocations for a while,” said Lee Yoo-jin, deputy spokeswoman at the Unification Ministry.

North Korea is known to test fewer missiles in the fourth quarter of the year, when troops are called to help with harvests and the cold strains its fuel supplies.

This week’s missile launch was the first in 75 days.

The latest provocation from the North prompted more insults from Trump, who referred to Kim as “Little Rocket Man” and a “sick puppy.”

Trump on Thursday also dismissed a Chinese diplomatic effort to rein in North Korea’s weapons program as a failure. In partial contrast, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said Beijing is doing a lot but could do more to limit oil supplies to Pyongyang.

Trump and Moon pledged to continue applying strong sanctions and pressure on North Korea to bring it to talks.

Addressing an emergency U.N. Security Council meeting after this week’s missile launch, the United States warned North Korea’s leadership it would be “utterly destroyed” if war were to break out.

/

What North Korea’s ICBM means for Japan’s defense planning

by

 

Yokozuna Harumafuji retires in wake of assault on junior sumo wrestler

by

The 33-year-old top-tier yokozuna from Mongolia submitted a letter of resignation to the Japan Sumo Association earlier in the day through his stablemaster, Isegahama, in Fukuoka.

At the time, senior members of the association were meeting to decide the official ranking of wrestlers for the first tournament of next year.

“Today, I retired because I feel responsible for having injured Takanoiwa,” Harumafuji told a nationally televised news conference from Fukuoka.

The towering wrestler then bowed deeply in apology without raising his head for about 30 seconds.

“I have done what yokozuna should not have done,” he said. “I told my stablemaster that I want to take the responsibility so that I would not stain the honor of yokozuna.”

Harumafuji will not qualify to become a stablemaster after retirement since he has retained his Mongolian citizenship. Under JSA rules, only a Japanese citizen can obtain the right to become a professional sumo stablemaster.

Harumafuji has reportedly admitted to assaulting Takanoiwa, 27, during a drinking event at a restaurant and bar in the city of Tottori.

The meeting was also attended by other Mongolian wrestlers, including grand champion Hakuho, who reportedly tried to stop Harumafuji during the assault on Takanoiwa, who is also from Mongolia.

Initial reports said Harumafuji struck Takanoiwa on the head with a beer bottle resulting in serious injuries, possibly including a skull fracture.

However, Harumafuji told Tottori police that he struck with his palms, fists and a karaoke machine remote control device, media reports quoted investigative sources as saying.

During the news conference, Harumafuji refrained from detailing exactly what happened during the drinking session. His stablemaster Isegahama said Harumafuji is not supposed to discuss details because of the ongoing investigation into the case.

Instead, Harumafuji just said he “went too far” when he tried to “rebuke” Takanoiwa so that he would learn “manners and etiquette.”

“If you strongly believe you are doing a right thing for someone, you can go too far,” he said. “That’s what I learned.”

Media reports have said the sport has a long history of senior sumo wrestlers using violence to bully their juniors in the exclusive atmosphere of a sumo stable.

However, Harumafuji flatly denied that he had ever committed a violent act against other wrestlers or witnessed such incidents, when asked at the news conference.

“I’ve never caused any trouble when I was drinking,” he said. “This incident didn’t happen because of alcohol.”

Harumafuji said he had decided to retire at a much earlier date, but did not make the announcement since the season’s sumo tournament had continued until Sunday.

The scandal came to light after the daily tabloid Sports Nippon reported the assault on Nov. 14.

The incident immediately caused a huge public outcry, having revived dark memories of repeated assaults by senior sumo wrestlers against their juniors.

In 2007, 17-year-old wrestler Tokitaizan, whose real name was Takashi Saito, died during training after being repeatedly beaten by three senior wrestlers.

Stablemaster Tokitsukaze, whose real name was Junichi Yamamoto, was later sentenced to three years imprisonment because he had ordered the assault on Tokitaizan by the three wrestlers, who were also found guilty of related charges.

In 2010, sumo champion Asashoryu, who is also Mongolian, retired from the sumo world following allegations that he had attacked a man outside a Tokyo nightclub.

Media reports over Harumafuji’s scandal have further intensified since stablemaster Takanohana, once one of the most popular sumo wrestlers, formally filed a report on the violent incident with police on Takanoiwa’s behalf. Since then, he has refused to cooperate with the JSA’s investigation, which has perplexed many observers.

Harumafuji made his debut as a professional sumo wrestler in Japan in 2001 and was promoted to the grand champion rank in 2012.

He won 712 matches during his time in the top-level makuuchi division, the sixth highest number of victories. He also won the tournament championship nine times.

Sumo body looks to demote stablemaster Takanohana over Harumafuji scandal

Kyodo     

 


Stablemaster Takanohana dismissed from post as director at Japan Sumo Association

Kyodo      

It is the first time a JSA director has been dismissed before the end of his term.

 

The JSA unanimously agreed to remove the 45-year-old as director and demote him two ranks within the organization’s hierarchy, leaving him as a board member, for his part in the scandal that has seen the image of the ancient sport again tarnished.

Takanohana’s punishment reflects his failure to promptly report the incident in which Takanoiwa, a wrestler from his stable, was beaten by fellow Mongolian Harumafuji in a drinking session at a bar during a regional tour in late October. Takanohana had also been criticized for refusing to cooperate with the internal investigation until he made himself available to the JSA crisis management panel on Dec. 25, despite having reported the case to the police.

The association also took disciplinary action against the two other yokozuna present at the assault — Hakuho and Kakuryu — by imposing pay cuts on them for failing to intervene. Sumo elder Isegahama, Harumafuji’s stablemaster, resigned from the JSA board.

Former vice education minister Yasuko Ikenobo, who chairs the seven-member council that serves as the association’s key decision-making body, was one of five members who met at an extraordinary session held at Tokyo’s Ryogoku Kokugikan on Thursday. Ikenobo said Takanohana was notified of his penalty by telephone and that he acknowledged the decision, saying “I understand.”

“We felt he bears a heavy responsibility and reached the decision to remove him as director,” Ikenobo said. “He violated the director’s duty of loyalty. I hope he solemnly accepts this, sincerely regrets what he did and shows more cooperation and respect going forward,” she said. Earlier in the day, Harumafuji was ordered to pay a fine of ¥500,000 ($4,000) by the Tottori Summary Court for injuring Takanoiwa, who required stitches on his head after he was slapped and struck with a karaoke remote control.

JSA chairman Hakkaku said last week that Takanohana is still eligible to run for a seat on the 10-man JSA board of directors in the next election in February. According to a JSA source, Isegahama, who was also given a two-rank demotion, will seek re-election.

Harumafuji ended his 17-year career in November after admitting to the assault. Takanoiwa, who was a rank-and-file top flight maegashira wrestler, had to sit out the entire 15-day Kyushu tournament due to his injuries and has been demoted to the second-tier division for the upcoming New Year meet.

Takanohana, whose real name is Koji Hanada, is known for boosting sumo’s popularity during his wrestling career, alongside his elder brother Wakanohana. The pair were active in the 1990s through the early 2000s.

Takanohana earned 22 tournament victories, sixth on the all-time list, while setting a number of records including becoming the youngest wrestler to win a top-division title at 19 years and five months. He retired in 2003.

He was elected to the JSA’s board of directors for the first time in 2010, but he lost to the association’s current chairman Hakkaku in the election to pick sumo’s new head in March 2016. Takanohana is considered an advocate of reform in a sport that has also been rocked in the past by allegations of match-fixing and hazing.

 

Sumo elder Takanohana fails to regain director seat on JSA board

                                                                                                                                                                             Kyodo     

Takanohana, 45, was demoted on Jan. 4 over his handling of last year’s assault scandal that led to the retirement of grand champion Harumafuji. The stablemaster was one of 11 candidates vying to fill the 10 seats on the JSA’s board of directors in Friday’s election.

 

He had won four straight election bids before being disciplined and demoted in January. This time, Takanohana received just two votes in the ballot of all 101 sumo elders at Tokyo’s Ryogoku Kokugikan stadium.

The punishment reflected his failure to promptly report the October incident in which Takanoiwa, a wrestler from his stable, was beaten by fellow Mongolian Harumafuji in a drinking session at a bar during a regional tour.

Takanohana had also been criticized for refusing to cooperate with the internal investigation until he made himself available to the JSA crisis management panel on Dec. 25, despite reporting the case to the police.

The stablemaster, whose real name is Koji Hanada, is known for boosting sumo’s popularity during a wrestling career spent alongside elder brother Wakanohana.

The pair were active from the 1990s through the early 2000s.

Takanohana earned 22 tournament victories, sixth on the all-time list, while setting records including the youngest wrestler to win a top-division title at 19 years and five months. He retired in 2003.

He was first elected to the JSA’s board in 2010 but lost to Chairman Hakkaku in the election to pick sumo’s new head in March 2016.

Takanohana is considered an advocate of reform in a sport that has been rocked by allegations of match-fixing and hazing.




 

                                       Christmas ! が近づいた我が家で

 

我が家のクリスマスツリーは三人のサンタさん
我が家のクリスマスツリーは三人のサンタさん

      クリスマスに咲いてくれるジャコバサボテン
      クリスマスに咲いてくれるジャコバサボテン
毎年咲いてくれるがもう何年目だろう、千恵子の手入れで元気だ
毎年咲いてくれるがもう何年目だろう、千恵子の手入れで元気だ












           白いカモメの集団が入り江にやって来て鳴き声が喧しい






母が転居祝いに贈ってくれた我が家の宝物 E. Earle作 森の風景 ( インクペイント )
母が転居祝いに贈ってくれた我が家の宝物 E. Earle作 森の風景 ( インクペイント )

                                                                                        Eyvind Earle

                   アイヴァンド・アール

                   アメリカ合衆国の画家      

        ※  Category:アメリカ合衆国の画家

                  出典: フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』
              このカテゴリには 160 ページが含まれており、そのうち以下の 160 ページを表示しています。

                                                                                                                                                             Back to Page of Contents